Brazil is the third largest carbon emitting country in the world. The
country is currently confronted with a number of environmental issues. Accompanied
by deforestation, there is illegal wildlife trade, air and water pollution, land
degradation, wetland degradation and oil spills. On the contrary, the country
boasts of the fifteenth largest world economy, implying they have the means and
ability to sustain the nation. Shasta Darlington, a CNN news writer, reported
on December the previous year, that the Brazilian senate passed an Amazon
deforestation code. The bill was stated as “controversial” because of the
particulars and specifications that was approved.
Senators
voted 59 to 7, approving the legislation after a long debate, stated by Darlington.
The bill is supported by ranchers and farmers but opposed by environmentalists.
“The bill reduces the percentage of land that farmers
and ranchers must maintain as forest when they develop it. It also establishes
an amnesty for some past illegal deforestation.” Darlington further included in
her report. Amnesty for past illegal deforestation? Relatively and
substantially implying that past illegal crimes have been somewhat forgiven or
forgotten. The theory and line of reasoning Senator Jorge Viana said in a
statement "Brazil has to take care of the environment, but at the same
time it also has a responsibility to feed the world." Brazil is the number
1 export of beef and second biggest soy exporter to the world. Yes, perhaps
Brazil plays a vital role in the exports of the food industry, but should the
environment suffer from this? Should the environment take a step down to let
the food industry grow and boom?
Brazil’s Senate voted in favor of the new Forest Code |
The final
verdict will lie heavily on the President, Dilma Rouseff. Challenging as it is,
the president has heavily favored development initiatives in the region, but
also must appease or pacify the left wing environmentalists in her coalition. A
tough choice entrusted upon a person with so much power and ability to change. As
a citizen, all we can do is hope for the best in the decisions higher-ranked
officials make and hope they do not conceal themselves in less substantial issues,
or probably finalize with justifiable and tenable vindications for the common
good.
- Adrian M. Francisco
I agree. Well said.
ReplyDelete